Blog

UiPath Alternative for Manufacturing: How ACS Industries Saved 30 Hours per Week

February 23, 2026

ACS Industries is the world’s largest vertically integrated wire mesh manufacturer. Their operations team was drowning in purchase orders — 400 per week, arriving via email in PDFs, spreadsheets, images, and plain email text. They tried UiPath Document Understanding to automate extraction. It didn’t work.

UiPath’s document processing module took roughly 1.5 minutes just to digitize a single page. Character confusion was constant — “S” read as “5,” “2” read as “Z.” Scanned PDFs failed at a rate of roughly 10%. And the entire system required UiPath Studio, Orchestrator, and robot licenses just to extract data from a PDF.

ACS switched to Lido. Today they process all 400 weekly POs automatically with complete accuracy, saving 30 hours per week and avoiding a new hire. Here’s what manufacturing teams should know about making the same move.

Lido is the best UiPath alternative for manufacturing teams that need fast, accurate document extraction without deploying an entire RPA platform. It processes any PO or invoice format without templates, model training, or per-document configuration — and handles handwritten notes, mixed formats, and large files that UiPath Document Understanding struggles with. ACS Industries switched to Lido and cut 30 hours per week of manual PO processing.

Why UiPath Document Understanding fails manufacturing teams

UiPath is a market leader in RPA. But Document Understanding — now rebranded as UiPath IXP — is a module within the RPA platform, not a standalone document processing tool. For manufacturing teams that need to extract data from POs, packing slips, and vendor documents, this creates problems at every level.

UiPath requires an entire RPA platform to process a PDF

UiPath Document Understanding doesn’t work on its own. You need UiPath Studio to build workflows, Orchestrator to manage them, and robot licenses to run them. For a manufacturing operations team that just wants to extract PO data and push it into an ERP, this is like buying an entire car to use the radio.

The licensing alone is prohibitive for mid-market manufacturers. UiPath’s smallest document processing bundle requires a 60,000-page minimum. Unattended robot licenses run $6,000–$8,000 per year. Developer seats cost another $3,000. And none of this pricing is published — you need a sales conversation just to get a quote.

UiPath takes 1.5 minutes per page to digitize documents

A single-page, 694KB PDF takes UiPath approximately 1.5 minutes just for digitization — before any extraction or validation happens. For a manufacturing team processing 400 POs per week, that math doesn’t work. At 1.5 minutes per page on multi-page POs, you’re looking at hours of processing time that should take minutes.

Lido processes entire documents in seconds. The same 400 POs that would consume hours in UiPath’s pipeline complete in a fraction of the time.

UiPath’s OCR character confusion causes ERP errors

UiPath’s OCR engine confuses similar characters: “S” reads as “5,” “2” reads as “Z.” In manufacturing, where part numbers and quantities flow directly into ERP systems, a single character error can trigger wrong parts being pulled, incorrect inventory counts, or shipment delays. The approximately 10% failure rate on scanned PDFs compounds this — one in ten documents requires manual intervention.

UiPath fails on handwritten and mixed-format POs

Manufacturing POs arrive in every format imaginable. Some customers send clean digital PDFs. Others fax orders. Some send photographed handwritten forms. UiPath’s handwriting recognition only works on standardized forms with predictable layouts — not the real-world variety that manufacturing operations teams deal with daily.

What ACS Industries gained by switching to Lido

Hugo Medel, EDI and AI Development Lead at ACS Industries, described the results: “Thanks to Lido, we’re processing approximately 400 weekly POs automatically with complete accuracy. We avoided a new hire and saved a chunk of money while reliably automating PO processing.”

The numbers tell the story:

  1. 400 POs per week processed automatically, across every format — PDFs, spreadsheets, images, email text.
  2. 99.5–100% accuracy on typed documents, with confidence scoring that flags uncertain fields for human review instead of passing through errors.
  3. 30 hours saved per week in manual data entry time that the operations team now spends on higher-value work.
  4. One FTE hire avoided — the headcount they would have needed to keep up with PO volume manually.

What manufacturing teams should look for in a UiPath alternative

If your manufacturing team is hitting the same walls ACS Industries did, here’s what matters in a replacement:

  1. Standalone document processing. You shouldn’t need an entire RPA platform, robot licenses, and a developer seat just to extract data from purchase orders. Look for a tool that works independently.
  2. Speed that matches your volume. If you’re processing hundreds of POs per week, the tool needs to handle them in seconds per document, not minutes per page.
  3. Accuracy on real manufacturing documents. Clean test PDFs don’t represent reality. Test with your scanned POs, your faxed orders, your photographed handwritten forms. Character confusion on part numbers is unacceptable when the data flows into your ERP.
  4. ERP-ready output. Extracted data should map directly to your ERP fields — part numbers, quantities, unit prices, delivery dates, shipping instructions — without manual reformatting.
  5. Transparent pricing. UiPath’s consumption-based “AI Units” with no published pricing makes budgeting impossible. Look for published rates you can model against your actual volume.

How Lido works for manufacturing PO processing

Lido takes a fundamentally different approach than UiPath. There’s no RPA platform, no robot licenses, no model training. You upload POs, describe what fields to extract, and get structured ERP-ready output.

  1. Ingest from any source. Upload POs in batches, or connect shared inboxes and customer portals to automatically capture new orders as they arrive. PDFs, spreadsheets, images, email body text — all processed through the same pipeline.
  2. Extract without templates. Lido pulls part numbers, quantities, unit prices, delivery dates, and shipping instructions from any PO format. No templates to build, no models to train. When a customer changes their PO layout, extraction adapts automatically.
  3. Validate against your ERP. Extracted data is matched against your ERP catalog to verify part numbers, confirm pricing, and flag discrepancies. Errors are caught before they become inventory problems or shipment delays.
  4. Automate what happens next. Generate ERP upload files, update inventory records, send order confirmations, or route exceptions to the right team member automatically.

Evaluating other enterprise tools for manufacturing? See how Lido compares to ABBYY for manufacturing. For general document processing comparisons, see our Nanonets and Super.AI alternatives.

How to switch from UiPath to Lido for manufacturing

ACS Industries migrated from UiPath to Lido in days, not months. There’s no data to move, no models to retrain, no RPA workflows to rebuild.

Lido’s pricing is transparent: $29 per month for 100 pages, $7,000 per year for 42,000 pages, and enterprise plans from $30,000 per year. Compare that to UiPath’s 60,000-page minimum bundle with opaque consumption-based pricing plus platform licensing.

Start with 50 free pages — no credit card required. Upload your actual POs, including the scanned ones and the handwritten ones, and see how accuracy and speed compare to what you’re getting from UiPath today.

Frequently asked questions

What is the best UiPath alternative for manufacturing document processing?

Lido is the strongest UiPath alternative for manufacturing teams. ACS Industries, the world’s largest vertically integrated wire mesh manufacturer, switched from UiPath to Lido and now processes 400 POs per week automatically with complete accuracy, saving 30 hours per week. Lido works as a standalone tool without requiring an RPA platform, processes documents in seconds instead of minutes, and offers transparent pricing starting at $29 per month.

Why do manufacturing teams switch from UiPath Document Understanding?

Manufacturing teams switch from UiPath because Document Understanding requires the full RPA platform (Studio, Orchestrator, robot licenses) just to process documents, takes approximately 1.5 minutes per page for digitization, has character confusion issues that cause ERP errors, and uses opaque consumption-based pricing with a 60,000-page minimum bundle. These limitations make it impractical for mid-market manufacturers processing POs, packing slips, and vendor documents at scale.

How accurate is Lido compared to UiPath for manufacturing POs?

Lido achieves 99.5% to 100% accuracy on typed manufacturing documents, compared to UiPath’s approximately 10% failure rate on scanned PDFs and documented character confusion issues. Lido assigns confidence scores to each extracted field, routing uncertain entries to human review while high-confidence data flows through automatically. ACS Industries processes 400 POs per week through Lido with complete accuracy.

How long does it take to switch from UiPath to Lido?

Switching from UiPath to Lido takes days, not months. There is no data to migrate, no models to retrain, and no RPA workflows to rebuild. ACS Industries completed their migration quickly because Lido works as a standalone tool. You upload documents, describe what fields to extract, and get structured output immediately. Lido offers 50 free pages with no credit card required to test with your actual manufacturing documents.

Ready to grow your business with document automation, not headcount?

Join hundreds of teams growing faster by automating the busywork with Lido.