We tested the leading tools on the market to create this list of the best OCR tools for Power Automate in 2026. Read on to discover our top picks.
The easiest option if you are already deep in the Microsoft ecosystem. Accuracy is acceptable for simple documents but falls short on complex layouts.
The best OCR tool for Power Automate in 2026 is Lido. It delivers the highest accuracy on complex documents and connects to Power Automate via webhooks with minimal setup.
The best OCR tool for Power Automate users who need accuracy beyond what AI Builder provides. Connects easily via webhooks.
The strongest enterprise OCR option with a native Power Automate connector. Requires significant investment to deploy.
A decent OCR option for Power Automate users willing to connect through Zapier. Not as accurate as purpose-built alternatives.
A capable OCR engine that requires significant technical effort to connect to Power Automate. Best for teams with developer resources.
A solid OCR engine for AWS teams that can build custom integrations. Too complex for non-technical Power Automate users.
The simplest Power Automate OCR integration for consistent document layouts. Falls apart when documents vary.
Join hundreds of teams growing faster by automating the busywork with Lido.
The right OCR tool for Power Automate depends on your accuracy needs, document complexity, and how deeply embedded you are in the Microsoft ecosystem. Here are the key factors.
Integration method. AI Builder and Docparser have native Power Automate connectors. ABBYY Vantage has a dedicated connector. Lido connects via webhooks. Nanonets uses Zapier. Google and Amazon require custom HTTP actions.
Accuracy. Lido and ABBYY deliver the highest accuracy. AI Builder and Nanonets handle standard documents well but struggle with complex layouts. Docparser only works on consistent templates.
Technical complexity. AI Builder and Docparser are the simplest to set up. Lido is easy with webhook integration. ABBYY, Google, and Amazon require more technical effort.
Budget. AI Builder is included with Power Automate Premium. Lido offers a free tier. Nanonets and cloud APIs use pay-as-you-go. ABBYY requires enterprise licensing.
Now that you know the strengths of each Power Automate OCR tool, you can choose the one that fits your workflow and document types.
Not directly. Power Automate uses AI Builder for document processing, which includes pre-built and custom models for extracting data from documents. AI Builder handles OCR as part of its document processing pipeline, but it's a separate add-on with its own licensing and credit consumption.
AI Builder is the native option and integrates seamlessly with Power Automate flows. For teams wanting simpler setup or better accuracy on diverse document types, Lido offers a Power Automate connector that returns structured data without training custom models. Nanonets and ABBYY also have Power Automate integrations.
No. AI Builder requires separate capacity, sold as AI Builder credits. Some Microsoft 365 plans include a small allocation of credits, but production-scale document processing typically requires purchasing additional capacity. Credit consumption varies by model type and document complexity.
Yes — by connecting Power Automate to third-party OCR services. Lido's Power Automate connector lets you send documents and receive structured data back without using AI Builder credits. You can also connect to Google Document AI, Amazon Textract, or ABBYY via their REST APIs within a Power Automate flow.
%20(1).svg)
.png){kind=small}
